Share:

MT. VERNON over GYPSUM CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+37.65738, -97.26886
37°39'27" N, 97°16'08" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:MT. VERNON over GYPSUM CREEK
Structure number:53040087000GC70
Location:MT. VERNON AT ROENOKE
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:59.1 ft. [18.0 m]
Total length:149.9 ft. [45.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:61.0 ft. [18.6 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1998
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,000 [as of 2006]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4]
Operating rating:82.8 tons [75.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:49.9 tons [45.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:80.1

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201580.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good5000
December 201380.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good5000
September 201180.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good5000
November 200980.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good5000
July 200780.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good5000
December 200279.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7080
February 200079.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7080
March 199724.2Structurally deficientPoorPoorFair7213
January 199522.4Not deficientPoorPoorFair8580
May 199330.7Structurally deficientPoorPoorFair6426
May 199168.8Not deficientFairSatisfactoryFair6426