HYDRAULIC AVENUE over BIG SLOUGH SOUTH
Map
Coordinates:
+37.58902, -97.3158237°35'20" N, 97°18'57" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | HYDRAULIC AVENUE over BIG SLOUGH SOUTH |
| Structure number: | 5304008700LBS05 |
| Location: | HYDRAULIC AT 57TH SOUTH |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 47.9 ft. [14.6 m] |
| Total length: | 120.1 ft. [36.6 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 47.9 ft. [14.6 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 64.0 ft. [19.5 m] |
| Skew angle: | 15° |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1962 |
| Year reconstructed: | 2006 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 3,800 [as of 2006] |
| Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 58.9 tons [53.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 31.9 tons [29.0 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 77.8 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 7,900 [as of 1995] |
| Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 17.9 tons [16.3 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 11.0 tons [10.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 36.8 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $135,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 5,652 [as of 1988] |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 47.5 tons [43.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 79.4 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $92,000 |