MID. CON. DR. (NB) over BNSF RR

Map 

Facts 

Name:	MID. CON. DR. (NB) over BNSF RR
Structure number:	5304008700MCR20
Location:	MID. CONT. RD.@ BNSF RR
Purpose:	Carries highway over railroad
Route classification:	Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:	65.0 ft. [19.8 m]
Total length:	302.2 ft. [92.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:	32.8 ft. [10.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:	35.8 ft. [10.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:	23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Skew angle:	16°
Owner:	City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:	1981
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:	5
Main spans material:	Prestressed concrete continuous [6]
Main spans design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

2010 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	8,250 [as of 2006]
Truck traffic:	4% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	39.9 tons [36.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	33.9 tons [30.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:	96.5

2000 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	7,600 [as of 1995]
Truck traffic:	4% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	58.9 tons [53.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	51.9 tons [47.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:	98.3

1992 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	7,672 [as of 1988]
Deck condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Very Good [8 out of 9]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	47.5 tons [43.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:	97.4

Comments