10TH STREET NORTH over WICHITA DRAINAGE CANAL
Map
Coordinates:
+37.70266, -97.3182637°42'10" N, 97°19'06" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | 10TH STREET NORTH over WICHITA DRAINAGE CANAL |
| Structure number: | 530400870WDC140 |
| Location: | 10TH ST AT I-135 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 44.9 ft. [13.7 m] |
| Total length: | 96.1 ft. [29.3 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 29.5 ft. [9.0 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 49.5 ft. [15.1 m] |
| Skew angle: | 15° |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1925 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 200 [as of 2006] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 73.8 tons [67.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 43.9 tons [39.9 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 68.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $310,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 150 [as of 1995] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 72.8 tons [66.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 43.9 tons [39.9 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 71.0 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $231,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 121 [as of 1980] |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 24.8 tons [22.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 18.6 tons [16.9 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 86.6 |