BROADWAY over CHISHOLM CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.72861, -97.3358837°43'43" N, 97°20'09" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | BROADWAY over CHISHOLM CREEK |
| Structure number: | 530400870WDCW25 |
| Location: | BROADWAY AT 25TH ST NORTH |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
| Total length: | 44.0 ft. [13.4 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 42.7 ft. [13.0 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 52.5 ft. [16.0 m] |
| Skew angle: | 10° |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1936 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 11,500 [as of 2006] |
| Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Culvert condition: | Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 42.9 tons [39.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 25.0 tons [22.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 66.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $260,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 11,218 [as of 1995] |
| Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Culvert condition: | Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 42.9 tons [39.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 25.0 tons [22.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 66.5 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $149,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 10,568 [as of 1988] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Culvert condition: | No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 47.5 tons [43.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 80.0 |