33RD STREET NORTH over CHISHOLM CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.74488, -97.3417537°44'42" N, 97°20'30" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | 33RD STREET NORTH over CHISHOLM CREEK |
| Structure number: | 530400870WDCW60 |
| Location: | 33RD ST NO AT WACO |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
| Total length: | 100.1 ft. [30.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 30.2 ft. [9.2 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 42.3 ft. [12.9 m] |
| Skew angle: | 45° |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 2001 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,500 [as of 2006] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 77.2 tons [70.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 42.5 tons [38.6 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 95.1 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,200 [as of 1995] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 24.0 tons [21.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 15.0 tons [13.6 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 28.8 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $255,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,050 [as of 1980] |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 24.8 tons [22.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 18.6 tons [16.9 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 65.5 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $174,000 |