US24 HWY over ANTELOPE CREEK DRAINAGE
Map
Coordinates:
+39.36357, -100.0974339°21'49" N, 100°05'51" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | US24 HWY over ANTELOPE CREEK DRAINAGE |
| Structure number: | 999902400330021 |
| Location: | 3.56 MI E SHERIDAN CO L |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
| Length of largest span: | 56.1 ft. [17.1 m] |
| Total length: | 250.7 ft. [76.4 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 33.5 ft. [10.2 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1957 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
| Number of main spans: | 5 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Low slump Concrete [4] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 640 [as of 2009] |
| Truck traffic: | 30% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 46.9 tons [42.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 27.8 tons [25.3 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 89.8 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $242,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 565 [as of 1999] |
| Truck traffic: | 27% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 46.5 tons [42.3 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 27.7 tons [25.2 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 89.7 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,168,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 670 [as of 1990] |
| Truck traffic: | 24% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 88.8 |