Share:

THIRTY FIRST ST over I-35 HWY (KTA)

Map 

Coordinates:
+37.63505, -97.28621
37°38'06" N, 97°17'10" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:THIRTY FIRST ST over I-35 HWY (KTA)
Structure number:999903500872443
Location:0.66 MI NE K-15
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:50.9 ft. [15.5 m]
Total length:178.5 ft. [54.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:61.4 ft. [18.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:25°
Owner:State Toll Authority [31]
Year built:1956
Year reconstructed:1994
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,965 [as of 2006]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:44.9 tons [40.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:27.0 tons [24.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:66.8
Recommended work:Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37]
Estimated cost of work:$296,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201566.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood9965
September 201366.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood9965
June 201285.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood9965
July 201185.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood9965
June 201085.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood9965
June 200985.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood9965
June 200885.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood9965
April 200785.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood9965
July 200685.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood8935
June 200585.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood8935
June 200485.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood10282
June 200385.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood10282
June 200285.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood10282
May 200185.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good10282
May 200085.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good10282
June 199985.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good10282
June 199885.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good10282
June 199772.5Not deficientVery GoodFairVery Good10282
July 199680.0Not deficientVery GoodFairVery Good10282
June 199480.0Functionally obsoleteExcellentFairExcellent10282
June 199261.0Structurally deficientSeriousFairPoor10282
August 199149.6Structurally deficientSeriousFairPoor10282