Share:

FEES ST. over I-35 HWY (KTA)

Map 

Coordinates:
+37.64040, -97.28299
37°38'25" N, 97°16'59" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:FEES ST. over I-35 HWY (KTA)
Structure number:999903500872453
Location:1.26 MI NE K-15
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:46.9 ft. [14.3 m]
Total length:160.4 ft. [48.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:28.9 ft. [8.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Toll Authority [31]
Year built:1956
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:822 [as of 2003]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:46.5 tons [42.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:37.2 tons [33.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:78.0
Recommended work:Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37]
Estimated cost of work:$122,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201578.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood822
September 201378.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood822
June 201279.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood822
July 201179.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood822
June 201079.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood822
June 200979.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood822
June 200854.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood822
May 200754.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood822
July 200654.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood822
June 200554.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood822
June 200453.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood420
June 200353.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood420
June 200253.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood420
May 200153.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood420
May 200053.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood420
June 199950.5Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory420
June 199850.5Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory420
June 199748.5Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory420
July 199648.1Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory420
June 199455.6Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory420
June 199269.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory420
August 199157.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory420