Share:

I-35 HWY SB (KTA) over URB6725, GREENWICH RD

Map 

Coordinates:
+37.67531, -97.20782
37°40'31" N, 97°12'28" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:I-35 HWY SB (KTA) over URB6725, GREENWICH RD
Structure number:999903500872583
Location:1.04 MI SW US-54
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Tolls:Yes, on toll road [2]
Length of largest span:55.1 ft. [16.8 m]
Total length:126.6 ft. [38.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:34.5 ft. [10.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Owner:State Toll Authority [31]
Year built:1956
Year reconstructed:1980
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Epoxy Overlay [5]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:8,450 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:16% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:61.5 tons [55.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:37.0 tons [33.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:87.1
Recommended work:Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37]
Estimated cost of work:$140,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201587.1Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood8450
September 201387.1Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood8450
June 201285.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory7450
July 201185.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodSatisfactory7370
July 201085.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodSatisfactory7370
June 200985.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodSatisfactory7150
June 200885.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodSatisfactory7300
May 200785.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodSatisfactory7150
July 200685.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodSatisfactory7055
June 200557.9Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodPoor7050
June 200457.9Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodPoor7100
June 200359.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodPoor6950
June 200259.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodPoor6860
May 200175.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair6800
May 200075.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair7115
June 199974.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair7115
June 199874.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair7085
June 199785.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood6475
July 199685.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood6065
June 199485.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood5410
May 199388.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood4635
June 199285.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood4745
August 199181.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory4635