Share:

I-35 HWY NB (KTA) over GREENWICH RD

Map 

Coordinates:
+37.67519, -97.20784
37°40'31" N, 97°12'28" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:I-35 HWY NB (KTA) over GREENWICH RD
Structure number:999903500872593
Location:1.05 MI SW US-54
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Tolls:Yes, on toll road [2]
Length of largest span:55.1 ft. [16.8 m]
Total length:126.6 ft. [38.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:34.5 ft. [10.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Owner:State Toll Authority [31]
Year built:1956
Year reconstructed:1980
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Epoxy Overlay [5]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:8,450 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:16% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:61.5 tons [55.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:37.0 tons [33.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:88.1
Recommended work:Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37]
Estimated cost of work:$140,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201588.1Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood8450
September 201388.1Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood8450
June 201285.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood7450
July 201185.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood7370
July 201085.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood7370
June 200985.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood7150
June 200885.2Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood7300
May 200785.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood7150
July 200685.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryGood7055
June 200585.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory7050
June 200485.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory7100
June 200386.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory6950
June 200286.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory6860
May 200186.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory6800
May 200086.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory7115
June 199985.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory7115
June 199885.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory7085
June 199785.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory6475
July 199685.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory6065
June 199485.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory5410
May 199388.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory4635
June 199285.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory4745
August 199181.7Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory4635