Share:

I235 HWY, NB over OKT RAILROAD

Map 

Coordinates:
+37.61866, -97.33732
37°37'07" N, 97°20'14" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:I235 HWY, NB over OKT RAILROAD
Structure number:999923500870661
Location:0.23 MI W BROADWAY ST, NB
Purpose:Carries highway over railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:76.1 ft. [23.2 m]
Total length:192.6 ft. [58.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:35.1 ft. [10.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:22.3 ft. [6.8 m]
Skew angle:39°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1961
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:18,700 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:38.9 tons [35.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:23.0 tons [20.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:57.1
Recommended work:Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37]
Estimated cost of work:$199,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201457.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood18700
August 201270.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood17750
September 201070.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood18550
August 200870.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodVery Good17250
August 200669.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodVery Good18500
August 200469.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodVery Good18800
August 200270.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodVery Good17250
March 200070.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory13810
September 199870.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory13810
April 199669.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory12810
July 199474.7Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodSatisfactory14930
February 199262.9Functionally obsoleteGoodFairSatisfactory11570
May 199061.8Functionally obsoleteGoodFairSatisfactory10145