I235 HWY, NB over ARKANSAS RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+37.72571, -97.3860837°43'33" N, 97°23'10" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | I235 HWY, NB over ARKANSAS RIVER |
| Structure number: | 999923500870971 |
| Location: | 1.08 MI NE BICKELL ST, NB |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11] |
| Length of largest span: | 45.6 ft. [13.9 m] |
| Total length: | 347.5 ft. [105.9 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 31.5 ft. [9.6 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1960 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
| Number of main spans: | 8 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 17,950 [as of 2009] |
| Truck traffic: | 11% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 50.3 tons [45.7 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 30.1 tons [27.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 75.1 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $360,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 17,470 [as of 1999] |
| Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 47.5 tons [43.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 28.7 tons [26.1 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 73.6 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,801,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 11,250 [as of 1990] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 36.1 tons [32.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 16.6 tons [15.1 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 55.0 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $360,000 |