+37.75675, -97.35409
37°45'24" N, 97°21'15" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:SENECA ST. over I235 HWY, NB/SB
Structure number:999923500871041
Location:0.98 MI E K96
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:68.9 ft. [21.0 m]
Total length:220.5 ft. [67.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:17.4 ft. [5.3 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:822 [as of 2003]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:88.8 tons [80.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:52.9 tons [48.1 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:86.5
Recommended work:Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37]
Estimated cost of work:$213,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201486.5Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodVery Good822
September 201286.5Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodVery Good822
August 201086.5Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodVery Good822
August 200886.5Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodVery Good822
August 200686.5Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodVery Good822
August 200495.0Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good200
August 200295.0Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good200
March 200095.0Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good200
August 199895.0Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good200
September 199790.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good200
April 199690.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good200
July 199490.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good200
February 199277.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good200
May 199065.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good200