Share:

I235 HWY, SB over BROADWAY,ATSF RR

Map 

Coordinates:
+37.75754, -97.33574
37°45'27" N, 97°20'09" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:I235 HWY, SB over BROADWAY,ATSF RR
Structure number:999923500871091
Location:JCT BROADWAY/I235, SB
Purpose:Carries highway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:54.1 ft. [16.5 m]
Total length:438.7 ft. [133.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:31.5 ft. [9.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:23.3 ft. [7.1 m]
Skew angle:13°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:9
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:23,600 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:55.8 tons [50.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.9 tons [29.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:61.8
Recommended work:Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37]
Estimated cost of work:$454,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201461.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood23600
September 201261.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood20750
September 201061.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood21700
August 200861.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood20400
August 200655.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good22100
August 200455.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good21450
August 200260.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good18400
March 200060.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good17205
August 199860.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good17205
February 199663.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good14465
July 199475.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good13820
January 199275.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood9630
May 199070.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood10710