Share:

US0090B over R/R, CITY STS

Map 

Coordinates:
+29.94812, -90.08356
29°56'53" N, 90°05'01" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:US0090B over R/R, CITY STS
Structure number:023602830800412
Location:.4 MI SOUTH OF I-10
Purpose:Carries highway overpass over highway and railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:176.8 ft. [53.9 m]
Total length:4481.2 ft. [1365.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:44.9 ft. [13.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:72
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:98,640 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:42.6 tons [38.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:29.7 tons [27.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:71.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$17,475,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201471.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood98640
April 201271.9Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood90780
September 200871.9Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood69360
August 200671.9Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood65880
July 200471.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good64612
August 200271.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good64612
August 199875.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good65932
20000.0Not applicable---103774
November 199237.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySeriousSatisfactory54411
November 198637.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySeriousSatisfactory54411