Share:

US0090 over CITY STS, I10 RAMPS, US9

Map 

Coordinates:
+29.94408, -90.07693
29°56'39" N, 90°04'37" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:US0090 over CITY STS, I10 RAMPS, US9
Structure number:023602830800915
Location:.91 MI SOUTH OF I-10
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:212.0 ft. [64.6 m]
Total length:3667.2 ft. [1117.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1994
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:26
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:16,440 [as of 2014]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:58.4 tons [53.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:31.7 tons [28.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:78.8
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$14,301,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
December 201478.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory16440
January 201378.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory15130
June 200878.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodGood11560
August 200678.8Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood10980
July 200497.8Not deficientVery GoodGoodGood10768
August 200297.8Not deficientVery GoodGoodGood10768
July 199899.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood10988
20000.0Not applicable---10988