Share:

LOCAL ROAD over ALMONASTER, L&N RAILROAD

Map 

Coordinates:
+30.00351, -90.02823
30°00'13" N, 90°01'42" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:LOCAL ROAD over ALMONASTER, L&N RAILROAD
Structure number:023630000900181
Location:0.1 MI. S. OF DOWNMAN RD
Purpose:Carries highway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:120.1 ft. [36.6 m]
Total length:1163.1 ft. [354.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:28.5 ft. [8.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:70.5 ft. [21.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.7 ft. [5.1 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1978
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:53.5 tons [48.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:95.0

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201595.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodVery Good-
March 201395.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good-
March 201183.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairVery Good-
May 200995.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodVery Good-
March 200794.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodVery Good-
June 200589.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodVery Good-
October 200389.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodVery Good-
February 200289.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodVery Good-
September 199989.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodVery Good-
August 199789.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodVery Good-
June 199589.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodVery Good-
May 199389.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodVery Good-
May 199186.0Structurally deficientPoorGoodVery Good-