Share:

CITY STREET over CITY STREET/RAILROAD

Map 

Coordinates:
+30.00735, -90.01958
30°00'26" N, 90°01'10" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CITY STREET over CITY STREET/RAILROAD
Structure number:023630004900101
Location:.15 MI S OF DOWNMAN ROAD
Purpose:Carries highway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:84.0 ft. [25.6 m]
Total length:2013.2 ft. [613.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:43.0 ft. [13.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1991
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:22
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:43.6 tons [39.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:68.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$7,849,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201568.0Structurally deficientGoodPoorGood-
March 201395.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood-
April 201195.0Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood-
April 200995.0Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood-
March 200795.0Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood-
June 200595.0Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood-
November 200395.0Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood-
January 200295.0Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood-
September 199995.0Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood-