+30.02880, -89.96610
30°01'44" N, 89°57'58" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:023630017895791
Location:0.2 MI. E. OF READ B
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Total length:67.9 ft. [20.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.6 ft. [7.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:35.4 ft. [10.8 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1975
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Unknown [*]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:75.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$250,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201575.0Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor-
February 201341.0Structurally deficientGoodGoodFair-
February 201132.0Structurally deficient----
April 200932.0Structurally deficient----
March 200732.0Structurally deficient----
June 200586.9Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory-
April 200389.9Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory-
December 200186.9Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory-
June 199975.9Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodFair-
July 199786.9Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood-
June 199586.9Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood-
May 199386.9Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood-
June 199187.9Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood-