+32.51101, -93.78028
32°30'40" N, 93°46'49" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:LA3094 over CROSS BAYOU
Structure number:040900250815431
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Total length:450.2 ft. [137.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:37.4 ft. [11.4 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Year reconstructed:1981
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:9
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:6,660 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:50.5 tons [45.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:29.7 tons [27.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:49.4
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$1,872,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201649.4Structurally deficientFairFairPoor6660
January 201549.5Structurally deficientFairFairPoor6480
July 201347.5Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor6600
February 201364.9Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair6720
February 201266.6Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair8640
February 201166.6Not deficientGoodGoodFair8520
February 201066.7Not deficientGoodGoodFair8400
February 200966.8Not deficientGoodGoodFair7620
January 200866.8Not deficientGoodGoodFair7620
March 200678.0Not deficientVery GoodGoodSatisfactory7260
July 200478.0Not deficientVery GoodGoodSatisfactory7260
February 200478.0Not deficientVery GoodGoodSatisfactory7320
March 200277.8Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory9128
February 200078.2Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory6118
January 199875.9Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory6118
February 199673.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory7309
May 199473.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory7236
January 199473.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood7560
February 199273.9Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood7837