+32.43174, -93.77845
32°25'54" N, 93°46'42" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:040932260934671
Location:0.3 MI. EAST OF U.S.
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Total length:97.1 ft. [29.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:41.0 ft. [12.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:51.5 ft. [15.7 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1972
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,482 [as of 1979]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7]
Operating rating:57.4 tons [52.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:76.5
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$496,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201576.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2482
April 201379.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2482
April 201179.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2482
March 200979.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2482
March 200779.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory2482
March 200579.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory2482
April 200379.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory2482
March 200179.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory2482
February 199979.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory2482
January 199779.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory2482
January 199579.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory2482
March 199379.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory2482
March 199179.5Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory2482