LOCAL ROAD over BICKHAM BAYOU
Map
Coordinates:
+32.46085, -93.8655932°27'39" N, 93°51'56" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | LOCAL ROAD over BICKHAM BAYOU |
| Structure number: | 040932276935191 |
| Location: | 0.7 MI N OF US 80 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 11.2 ft. [3.4 m] |
| Total length: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 49.9 ft. [15.2 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 109.9 ft. [33.5 m] |
| Skew angle: | 30° |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1987 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 4,200 [as of 1979] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Culvert condition: | No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 80.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $234,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 4,200 [as of 1979] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Culvert condition: | No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 79.2 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $130,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 4,200 [as of 1979] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Culvert condition: | No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 79.2 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $130,000 |