Share:

CITY STREET over CORPORATION CANAL

Map 

Coordinates:
+30.41173, -91.17097
30°24'42" N, 91°10'15" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CITY STREET over CORPORATION CANAL
Structure number:611730248911031
Location:L.S.U CAMPUS
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Total length:95.1 ft. [29.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:26.2 ft. [8.0 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1955
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 13.5 / HS 15 [3]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Serious [3 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:30.7 tons [27.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:14.9 tons [13.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:35.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$333,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
December 201535.0Structurally deficientFairFairSerious-
December 201344.9Structurally deficientFairFairSerious-
January 201244.9Not deficientFairFairSerious-
February 201045.9Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSerious-
February 200845.9Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodSerious-
March 200645.9Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodSerious-
June 200459.9Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodPoor-
June 200275.9Not deficientGoodGoodFair-
August 200078.9Not deficientGoodGoodFair-
July 199889.9Not deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory-
August 199689.9Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory-
September 199389.9Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-
June 199188.9Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-