LOCAL ROAD over WARD CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+30.43591, -91.1329330°26'09" N, 91°07'59" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | LOCAL ROAD over WARD CREEK |
| Structure number: | 611730261910801 |
| Location: | BATON ROUGE |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
| Total length: | 121.1 ft. [36.9 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 43.0 ft. [13.1 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 57.1 ft. [17.4 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1967 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 6 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 11,676 [as of 1979] |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 81.2 tons [73.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 75.9 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $633,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 11,676 [as of 1979] |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 81.2 tons [73.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 75.9 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $633,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 11,676 [as of 1979] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 81.2 tons [73.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 76.7 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $633,000 |