+30.47066, -91.03467
30°28'14" N, 91°02'05" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:611730280910201
Location:N. FLANNERY RD.
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Total length:78.1 ft. [23.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Skew angle:28°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1965
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Wood or timber [7]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:10,200 [as of 1979]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Serious [3 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:29.7 tons [27.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:16.8 tons [15.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:10.4
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$280,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201510.4Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSerious10200
August 201310.4Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairSerious10200
October 201110.4Structurally deficientSatisfactorySeriousSerious10200
July 200942.5Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor10200
July 200756.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair10200
July 200556.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair10200
September 200366.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory10200
October 200170.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory10200
January 200070.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory10200
January 199871.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory10200
February 199671.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood10200
June 199471.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodVery Good10200
May 199270.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood10200