Share:

LA0001 over MO PACIFIC RR

Map 

Coordinates:
+30.48309, -91.21124
30°28'59" N, 91°12'40" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:LA0001 over MO PACIFIC RR
Structure number:616100500711951
Location:LA0001
Purpose:Carries highway over railroad
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Total length:1392.1 ft. [424.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.2 ft. [8.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:33.5 ft. [10.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1952
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:37
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,180 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:22% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:43.6 tons [39.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:25.7 tons [23.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:35.1
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$5,428,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201535.1Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor9180
August 201344.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorFair9000
September 201261.7Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair8460
August 201161.7Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair8400
May 201062.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory7860
May 200966.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory7560
May 200876.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood8220
May 200776.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood7920
May 200676.0Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood7980
May 200576.2Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood6840
May 200376.1Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood7020
May 200276.1Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood7080
May 200176.1Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood7107
May 200074.1Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood7107
May 199974.1Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood7107
May 199876.3Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodGood7107
May 199776.5Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodGood5904
May 199676.8Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodGood3213
May 199576.9Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodGood3150
May 199476.9Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodGood3061
May 199376.7Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodGood5217
May 199276.6Functionally obsoleteFairVery GoodGood6092