HWY SPRING ST over WATER HOOSIC RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+42.62181, -73.1154942°37'19" N, 73°06'56" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | HWY SPRING ST over WATER HOOSIC RIVER |
| Structure number: | A0401300HMUNNBI |
| Old structure number: | MUN101010100 (from 1992 edition) |
| Location: | .25 MI W OF EAST RD |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 40.4 ft. [12.3 m] |
| Total length: | 47.9 ft. [14.6 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 42.0 ft. [12.8 m] |
| Skew angle: | 9° |
| Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
| Year built: | 1957 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 2,000 [as of 2007] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 42.2 tons [38.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.5 tons [24.1 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 75.0 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $800,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 2,000 [as of 1997] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 42.2 tons [38.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.5 tons [24.1 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 76.0 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $454,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,920 [as of 1991] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 42.2 tons [38.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.3 tons [23.9 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 81.6 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $454,000 |