Share:

ST 28 CHAS R DM RD over WATER CHARLES RIVER

Map 

Coordinates:
+42.36139, -71.07583
42°21'41" N, 71°04'33" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:ST 28 CHAS R DM RD over WATER CHARLES RIVER
Structure number:B160134ETDOTNBI
Old structure number:MDC896040101 (from 1992 edition)
Location:.2 MI NW OF NASHUA ST
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Total length:116.1 ft. [35.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:65.0 ft. [19.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:86.0 ft. [26.2 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1906
Year reconstructed:2011
Historic significance:Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3]
Number of main spans:10
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:44,000 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:68.4 tons [62.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:34.2 tons [31.1 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:39.9

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201439.9Not deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor44000
February 201238.5Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor52000
February 201021.5Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSerious49500
February 200068.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory49500
February 199654.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair54304
February 199439.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor46147
February 199239.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor47000