HWY ARSENAL ST over WATER CHARLES RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+42.36139, -71.1475042°21'41" N, 71°08'51" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | HWY ARSENAL ST over WATER CHARLES RIVER |
| Structure number: | B160154EFDOTNBI |
| Old structure number: | MDC896007100 (from 1992 edition) |
| Location: | CITY LINE WAT BOS |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 69.9 ft. [21.3 m] |
| Total length: | 203.1 ft. [61.9 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 50.2 ft. [15.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 64.0 ft. [19.5 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
| Skew angle: | 40° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1925 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1968 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 40,000 [as of 2005] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Operating rating: | 69.2 tons [62.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 69.2 tons [62.9 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 58.3 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $5,030,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 8,900 [as of 1997] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 69.2 tons [62.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 69.2 tons [62.9 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 77.4 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $2,923,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 18,500 [as of 1992] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 79.5 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $2,923,000 |