Share:

HWY PARK DR over TR GREEN LINE D

Map 

Coordinates:
+42.34525, -71.10443
42°20'43" N, 71°06'16" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:HWY PARK DR over TR GREEN LINE D
Structure number:B160634V3MBTNBI
Location:NEAR SEARS BLDG
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:86.9 ft. [26.5 m]
Total length:90.9 ft. [27.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:104.0 ft. [31.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Skew angle:16°
Owner:Other State Agencies [21]
Year built:1950
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:20,300 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:100.2 tons [91.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:62.8 tons [57.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:90.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$758,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
December 201490.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood20300
December 201288.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood20300
July 201273.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood21000
August 201073.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood21000
July 200873.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood21000
July 200673.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood21000
July 200473.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood21000
July 200273.6Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood21000
July 200073.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood21000