Share:

HWY BLAKEMORE ST over RR AMTRAK/MBTA

Map 

Coordinates:
+42.28551, -71.11954
42°17'08" N, 71°07'10" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:HWY BLAKEMORE ST over RR AMTRAK/MBTA
Structure number:B16105390MUNNBI
Location:3.8 W OF RT 93
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:70.9 ft. [21.6 m]
Total length:75.1 ft. [22.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:41.0 ft. [12.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:17.7 ft. [5.4 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1882
Year reconstructed:1950
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,900 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:80.7 tons [73.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:55.2 tons [50.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:70.7
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$1,337,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201570.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood9900
March 201370.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood9900
March 201170.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood9900
March 200970.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood9900
March 200770.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood9600
March 200570.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood9400
November 200270.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood13100
December 200070.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood11200