Share:

HWY MEDWAY ST over TR RED HSL

Map 

Coordinates:
+42.27107, -71.06458
42°16'16" N, 71°03'52" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:HWY MEDWAY ST over TR RED HSL
Structure number:B161474VQMBTNBI
Location:0.3 MI FROM LOWER MILLS
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:79.4 ft. [24.2 m]
Total length:85.3 ft. [26.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:Other State Agencies [21]
Year built:1928
Year reconstructed:1999
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:800 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:45.8 tons [41.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:69.8
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,249,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201469.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair800
November 201269.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair800
July 201238.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair700
November 200938.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair700
March 200738.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodFair700
January 200638.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodFair700
February 200338.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodFair700
February 200138.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodFair700
February 199927.5Structurally deficientPoorPoorFair700