Share:

HWY MASS AVE over ST 9 HUNTINGTON AVE

Map 

Coordinates:
+42.34279, -71.08498
42°20'34" N, 71°05'06" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:HWY MASS AVE over ST 9 HUNTINGTON AVE
Structure number:B1623838PMUNNBI
Old structure number:38PMUN896238100 (from 1992 edition)
Location:.7 MI S OF CHARLES RIV
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:48.9 ft. [14.9 m]
Total length:55.1 ft. [16.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:95.1 ft. [29.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:158.5 ft. [48.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.5 ft. [4.1 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1941
Year reconstructed:1976
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:22,100 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:13% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:47.2 tons [42.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:5.5 tons [5.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:27.6
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$2,966,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201427.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory22100
March 201227.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory22100
March 201038.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory21900
March 200838.4Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory21900
March 200638.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory21600
March 200437.6Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood24700
March 200237.8Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood24000
March 200038.9Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryGood19900
March 199840.1Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood19900
March 199640.4Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood19900