Share:

US 1 RAMP CT over COMB I93 SB &RMPS& MBTA

Map 

Coordinates:
+42.37194, -71.06778
42°22'19" N, 71°04'04" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:US 1 RAMP CT over COMB I93 SB &RMPS& MBTA
Structure number:B166108YFDOTNBI
Location:I93/US1 INTERCHANGE
Purpose:Carries highway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:195.9 ft. [59.7 m]
Total length:688.4 ft. [209.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:39.7 ft. [12.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:2001
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete continuous [6]
Main spans design:Segmental box girder [21]
Deck type:Other [9]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:20,600 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:85.6 tons [77.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:51.0 tons [46.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:92.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$370,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201492.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryVery Good20600
September 201292.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryVery Good20600
March 201092.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood20600
March 200881.0Not deficientVery GoodSatisfactoryGood174630