Share:

I 93 RAMP MW over COMB HOV EB & MBTA WYE

Map 

Coordinates:
+42.34444, -71.06056
42°20'40" N, 71°03'38" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:I 93 RAMP MW over COMB HOV EB & MBTA WYE
Structure number:B166718TLDOTNBI
Location:0.5 MI S. OF I-90 EB
Purpose:Carries highway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:143.4 ft. [43.7 m]
Total length:487.9 ft. [148.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:26.2 ft. [8.0 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Skew angle:11°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:2001
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete continuous [6]
Main spans design:Segmental box girder [21]
Deck type:Other [9]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,785 [as of 2005]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:61.8 tons [56.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:29.8 tons [27.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:90.8
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$4,306,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201590.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood7785
March 201390.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood7785
March 201191.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood5411
April 200934.1Not deficientGoodGoodGood5411