Share:

CHARLES STREET over AMTRAK

Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CHARLES STREET over AMTRAK
Structure number:200000BC1210010
Location:0.2 MI N OF MT ROYAL AVE
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:66.9 ft. [20.4 m]
Total length:235.9 ft. [71.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:65.9 ft. [20.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Skew angle:33°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:2003
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:18,800 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:61.8 tons [56.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:74.6
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$1,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201474.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good18800
November 201273.6Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good18800
November 201073.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good18800
January 201073.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good18800
January 200873.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good18800
November 200573.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good18800
January 200673.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good18800
December 200373.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good18800
January 20029.2Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious4919
February 20009.2Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious4919
January 19989.2Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious4919
March 199511.2Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious4919
December 199211.2Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious4919
April 199111.2Structurally deficientPoorPoorSerious4919