BALTIMORE ST over GWYNNS FALLS, CSX
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | BALTIMORE ST over GWYNNS FALLS, CSX |
| Structure number: | 200000BC2402010 |
| Location: | 0.2 MI E HILTON PKWY |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad and waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 113.9 ft. [34.7 m] |
| Total length: | 326.1 ft. [99.4 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 42.0 ft. [12.8 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 55.8 ft. [17.0 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1931 |
| Year reconstructed: | 2000 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 8,570 [as of 2007] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Operating rating: | 39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 80.0 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $27,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
| Average daily traffic: | 13,427 [as of 1994] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Operating rating: | 13.9 tons [12.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 7.9 tons [7.2 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 3.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $3,666,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 13,427 [as of 1988] |
| Superstructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 2.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |