Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:200000BC3401010
Location:0.2 MI W HARFORD RD
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:76.1 ft. [23.2 m]
Total length:384.9 ft. [117.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.3 ft. [13.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:56.8 ft. [17.3 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1958
Year reconstructed:2011
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:11,600 [as of 2007]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:79.9 tons [72.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:47.9 tons [43.5 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:98.4
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$13,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201698.4Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood11600
December 201398.4Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood11600
December 201197.4Not deficientExcellentExcellentGood11600
December 200949.4Structurally deficientFairFairPoor11600
December 200749.4Structurally deficientFairFairPoor11600
December 200549.4Structurally deficientFairFairPoor11600
October 200348.4Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor11600
January 200265.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair9990
January 200065.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair9990
January 199864.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair9990
March 199566.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair9990
October 199266.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair9990
December 199066.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodSatisfactoryFair9990