LOCH RAVEN BOULEVA over CHINQUAPIN RUN

Facts 

Name:	LOCH RAVEN BOULEVA over CHINQUAPIN RUN
Structure number:	200000BC3403011
Location:	0.6 MI N COLDSPRING LA
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:	Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:	73.2 ft. [22.3 m]
Total length:	203.1 ft. [61.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:	24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:	32.8 ft. [10.0 m]
Owner:	City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:	1932
Year reconstructed:	1977
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:	M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:	3
Main spans material:	Concrete [1]
Main spans design:	Arch - Deck [11]
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:	Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

2010 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	32,200 [as of 2007]
Truck traffic:	8% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Channel protection:	Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:	Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3]
Operating rating:	81.2 tons [73.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	51.5 tons [46.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	68.0
Recommended work:	Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:	$81,000

2000 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	28,000 [as of 1994]
Truck traffic:	8% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Channel protection:	Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:	Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3]
Operating rating:	81.2 tons [73.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	51.5 tons [46.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	68.0
Recommended work:	Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:	$80,000

1992 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	28,000 [as of 1988]
Deck condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Channel protection:	Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:	81.2 tons [73.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	51.5 tons [46.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	78.3

Comments