Share:

CEDAR / WYMAN PARK over I-83 AND MTA

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.32000, -76.63000
39°19'12" N, 76°37'48" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CEDAR / WYMAN PARK over I-83 AND MTA
Structure number:200000BC3501010
Location:0.2 MI N 29TH ST
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway, waterway, and railroad
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:118.1 ft. [36.0 m]
Total length:437.0 ft. [133.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:23.3 ft. [7.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:39.0 ft. [11.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1961
Year reconstructed:1988
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:25,900 [as of 2007]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:72.8 tons [66.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:43.9 tons [39.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:70.0
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$61,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201470.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory25900
June 201270.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory25900
June 201070.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory25900
May 200870.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory25900
February 200870.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory25900
November 200570.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory25900
December 200382.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory25900
January 200283.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory22960
February 200083.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory22960
March 199883.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory22960
June 199584.4Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory22960
November 199287.9Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood14503
December 199080.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood14503