Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:200000BC4212010
Location:1 MI E ERDMAN AVE
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:65.9 ft. [20.1 m]
Total length:136.2 ft. [41.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:56.8 ft. [17.3 m]
Skew angle:24°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1958
Year reconstructed:1985
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:37,800 [as of 2007]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Inventory rating:70.8 tons [64.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:59.8
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$184,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201659.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair37800
April 201459.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair37800
April 201259.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair37800
April 201059.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair37800
February 200859.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair37800
October 200559.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair37800
September 200359.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair37800
November 200160.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair32800
November 199973.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory32800
November 199774.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory32800
January 199774.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory32800
March 199573.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory32800
October 199277.3Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodSatisfactory13837
October 199076.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood13837