Share:

KEITH AVENUE over BROENING HIGHWAY

Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:KEITH AVENUE over BROENING HIGHWAY
Structure number:200000BC4301010
Location:KEITH AVE OV BROENING HWY
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:78.1 ft. [23.8 m]
Total length:195.9 ft. [59.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:30.2 ft. [9.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:33.5 ft. [10.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Skew angle:13°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1973
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,690 [as of 2007]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:89.8 tons [81.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:54.9 tons [49.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:77.0
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$102,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201477.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair1690
October 201273.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair1690
October 201088.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory1690
December 200988.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory1690
December 200788.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory1690
October 200588.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory1690
September 200388.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory1690
November 200188.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory1450
November 199961.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory1450
January 199890.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory1450
July 199591.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory1450
November 199296.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory25
November 199096.0Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood25