Share:

RADECKE AVENUE over MOORE'S RUN

Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RADECKE AVENUE over MOORE'S RUN
Structure number:200000BC4405010
Location:0.2 MI W CEDONIA AVE
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Total length:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.4 ft. [12.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:50.5 ft. [15.4 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1930
Year reconstructed:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,818 [as of 2007]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Serious [3 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3]
Operating rating:67.9 tons [61.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:44.9 tons [40.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:51.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$138,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201451.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySeriousPoor9818
May 201251.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySeriousPoor9818
May 201051.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySeriousPoor9818
February 200851.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySeriousPoor9818
October 200551.1Structurally deficientSatisfactorySeriousPoor9350
August 200365.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair9350
November 200165.8Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair8199
November 199965.8Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory8199
December 199779.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory8199
January 199779.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory8199
March 199579.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory8199
October 199279.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory8199
October 199078.4Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory8199