Share:

BREHMS LANE over HERRING RUN

Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:BREHMS LANE over HERRING RUN
Structure number:200000BC4501010
Location:0.8 MI W ERDMAN AVE
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:87.9 ft. [26.8 m]
Total length:91.9 ft. [28.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:30.2 ft. [9.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:42.3 ft. [12.9 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1963
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:28,875 [as of 2007]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:90.8 tons [82.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:54.3 tons [49.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:44.6
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$175,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
December 201444.6Structurally deficientPoorFairPoor28875
December 201262.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair28875
December 201062.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair28875
December 200962.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair28875
December 200762.7Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair28875
October 200562.9Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair27500
September 200362.9Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactoryFair27500
November 200164.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair23900
November 199964.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair23900
November 199765.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair23900
January 199765.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair23900
March 199567.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair23900
October 199283.3Not deficientGoodGoodFair1229
October 199094.3Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood1229