Share:

HANOVER STREET over CSX

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.26720, -76.61489
39°16'02" N, 76°36'54" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:HANOVER STREET over CSX
Structure number:200000BC5209010
Location:HANOVER ST OVER CSX RR
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:68.9 ft. [21.0 m]
Total length:206.0 ft. [62.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:69.6 ft. [21.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1929
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:23,800 [as of 2007]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:51.7
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$139,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201451.7Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair23800
October 201249.1Structurally deficientPoorFairFair23800
October 201049.1Structurally deficientPoorFairFair23800
November 200849.1Structurally deficientPoorFairFair23800
July 200658.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair23800
March 200459.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair23800
March 200260.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair23600
February 200061.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair20704
February 199861.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair20704
July 199561.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair20704
November 199262.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair20704
January 199173.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory20704