HANOVER STREET over MIDDLE BRANCH
Map
Coordinates:
+39.25986, -76.6154339°15'36" N, 76°36'56" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | HANOVER STREET over MIDDLE BRANCH |
| Structure number: | 200000BC5210010 |
| Location: | 0.5 MI S OF I 95 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 229.0 ft. [69.8 m] |
| Total length: | 2023.1 ft. [616.6 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 71.9 ft. [21.9 m] |
| Vertical clearance below bridge: | 36.7 ft. [11.2 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1916 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1992 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Movable - Bascule [16] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 14,220 [as of 2007] |
| Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Operating rating: | 50.5 tons [45.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 32.7 tons [29.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 76.1 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $769,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, posting recommended but not legally implemented [B] |
| Average daily traffic: | 12,700 [as of 1994] |
| Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Operating rating: | 50.5 tons [45.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 32.7 tons [29.7 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 76.3 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $167,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 20,704 [as of 1988] |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 23.0 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |