+39.24673, -76.61105
39°14'48" N, 76°36'40" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:200000BC5211010
Location:1.3 MI S OF IS 95
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Total length:666.0 ft. [203.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:62.0 ft. [18.9 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1973
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:11
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:23,600 [as of 2007]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:None present but re-evaluation suggested [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:84.8 tons [77.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:48.8 tons [44.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:74.2
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$107,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201474.2Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory23600
July 201274.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory23600
July 201074.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory23600
July 200874.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory23600
July 200674.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory23600
March 200474.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory23600
February 200274.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory23600
January 200074.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory20704
January 199874.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory20704
March 199577.1Not deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory20704
January 199378.1Not deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory20704
November 199078.1Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood20704