Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:200000BC6503010
Location:0.09 MI W CROMWELL BRDG R
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Total length:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:19.4 ft. [5.9 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year reconstructed:2007
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2016 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:309 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Pier/abutment protection:In place and functioning [2]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:25.0 tons [22.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:15.0 tons [13.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:50.1
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$73,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201650.1Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood309
October 201442.2Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood5660
October 201241.9Not deficientGoodGoodGood5660
October 201010.3Not deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory5660
October 200910.3Not deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory5660
October 200710.3Structurally deficientGoodPoorGood5660
October 200510.3Structurally deficientGoodPoorGood5660
October 200310.3Structurally deficientGoodPoorGood5660
November 200112.3Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory4200
November 199912.3Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory4200
December 199712.3Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory4200
January 199712.3Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory4200
April 199511.3Structurally deficientFairPoorSatisfactory4200
December 199212.3Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorPoor4200
October 199012.3Structurally deficientGoodPoorGood4200