Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:200000BC8026010
Location:0.2 MI NE OF BROADWAY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Total length:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:60.4 ft. [18.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:75.8 ft. [23.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year reconstructed:1914
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Masonry [8]
Main span design:Arch - Deck [11]
Deck type:Other [9]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,660 [as of 2007]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:50.0
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$95,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201450.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory9660
April 201250.0Structurally deficient-PoorSatisfactory9660
April 201050.0Structurally deficient-PoorFair9660
February 200850.0Structurally deficient-PoorFair9660
February 200650.0Structurally deficient-PoorFair9660
December 200350.0Structurally deficient-PoorFair9660
December 200169.5Functionally obsolete-FairSatisfactory-
December 199969.5Functionally obsolete-FairGood-
January 199879.5Functionally obsolete-SatisfactoryGood-
August 199579.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood-
November 199286.0Functionally obsoleteFairGoodGood-
January 199187.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood-